Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Becoming Human's avatar

Matt, I love you, but you are describing indentured servitude, which was used during Jamestown. It is grotesquely immoral, and the knock on effects are subhuman.

Indenture in Jamestown led directly to slavery, as debt peonage was essentially human ownership. What if someone can’t pay their debts? Do they get deported? Imprisoned? Do they have rights as citizens (check recent Supreme Court rulings before you answer)?

This is an insanely bad idea, though oddly not the worst to come out of Silicon Valley these days.

Expand full comment
AP's avatar

I like President Trump's plan: $5 trillion could go straight to debt reduction. Plus those 1 million extra high net worth bodies would probably generate much more tax revenue per capita than the average American, helping to close the annual budget deficit without raising tax rates on existing citizens. Your plan doesn't generate nearly enough revenue to make much of a dent in either the debt or the deficit (unless I'm misunderstanding your numbers).

If the U.S. really wants to stem the tide of illegal immigration, we need to export freedom and democracy to countries whose governments (or cartels/gangs) are so repressive that they encourage their citizens to flee to the U.S. Not sure exactly how we do that, but let's face it: we have a much smaller illegal immigration problem from our northern border than our southern border. If Mexico (and other Central American nations) had bustling economies and PPP-adjusted per capita incomes that rival the U.S., I sincerely doubt we'd see the level of illegal immigration that we face today.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts